24 Feb
2016
24 Feb
'16
12:57 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Paul Koning <paulkoning at comcast.net> wrote:
putting all of that original 11/10 stuff aside :-)
There is a version of the processor handbook with all 4, and there is a
version with just 11/40. I have never seen a processor handbook for just
the 11/35, 11/05, or 11/10 by itself.
--
@ BillDeg:
Web: vintagecomputer.net
Twitter: @billdeg <https://twitter.com/billdeg>
Youtube: @billdeg <https://www.youtube.com/user/billdeg>
Unauthorized Bio <http://www.vintagecomputer.net/readme.cfm>
On Feb 24, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Noel Chiappa <jnc
at mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
wrote:
So, what's the best short name for the pair of machines, the PDP-11/05
and
PDP-11/10 (which differ only in the nameplate)?
I have generally been calling them the '11/05's, since that's what's on
many
of the extant drawings, manuals, etc - and DEC
seems to prefer the '05'
in
manual ID's, even when the title references
both - e.g.
DEC-11-H05SS-B-D is
the "PDP-11/05-S, PDP-11/10-S system
manual", with the /05 mentioned
first.
However, for the 11/35 and 11/40, which we seem to normally call the
11/40
(again, following DEC's lead -
EK-11040-TM-002 is the "PDP-11/40, -11/35
system manual", with the /40 mentioned first), the /40 is the end user
machine.
With the /05 being the OEM machine, and the /10 end user one, we (and
DEC)
seem to have picked the OEM variant in one as the
'canonical' model, and
in
the other, the end-user variant.
Interesting point. FWIW, I have always heard 11/05 and 11/40 respectively.
paul