I used to populate the XMS cards with 256K DRAM as well, largest being
2MB (72 chips). As I recall, the 256K DRAM dips were down to about
$2.50~$3.50 a pop when our benevolent Congress stepped in to help us
and the price rose to the $12.00+ range. I was impressed. We had
orders to fill and were being burned bad.... those weren't the days.
Marty Mintzell
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Getting bent (ON topic if not thread)
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 3/13/98 3:17 PM
At 12:52 3/13/98 -0600, David wrote:
256K DRAMs bring back all sorts of bad memories. We
used to sell 384K
expansions for the PCjr....Not only were they hell to populate, but when
the DRAM prices went through the roof, we were only selling a few at ~$300
a pop.
The thing about those Everex 3MB XMS cards was, I actually did several of
them (groan) with DRAM I'd stocked up on. At the worst of the RAM spike,
the best price I could have gotten on 256K DRAM was US$12.45 per chip.
Which made those d**n Everex cards worth, nominally, over $1300 each....
but we just gritted our teeth, because a 9-chip 1MB 30-pin SIMM was $595!
__________________________________________
Kip Crosby engine(a)chac.org
http://www.chac.org/index.html
Computer History Association of California
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from
lists2.u.washington.edu by
smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Mar13.151714.1767.31564; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 15:17:17 -0500
Received: from host (
lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by
lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id MAA16957; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 12:09:44 -0800
Received: from
mxu2.u.washington.edu (
mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by
lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id MAA19848 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>du>; Fri, 13 Mar 1998
12:09:27 -0800
Received: from
relay.batnet.com (
relay1.batnet.com [204.188.144.18])
by
mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with SMTP
id MAA28221 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>du>; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 12:09:26
-0800
Received: from goldrush by
relay.batnet.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id MAA13871; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 12:08:49 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980313120654.00f77620(a)pop.batnet.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 12:06:54 -0800
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Kip Crosby <engine(a)chac.org>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Getting bent (ON topic if not thread)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980313125240.008fd8e0(a)pop3.webzone.net>
References: <3.0.5.32.19980313102815.00f64130(a)pop.batnet.com>
<9803131239.ZM19878(a)indy.dunnington.york.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Sender: chac(a)pop.batnet.com
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN