30 Jul
2013
30 Jul
'13
1:23 p.m.
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:25:29 -0500, Geoffrey Oltmans
<oltmansg at gmail.com> wrote:
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:25:29 -0500
From: Geoffrey Oltmans<oltmansg at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: My Atari 1040ST(FM) on YouTube
Message-ID:
<CABVr2Pti9OwUB_De4uyHZGh7vtLLjCqiHa3Zo6=obYEgrnQfoA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
All of the other examples so far I think (with the exception of the QL and
Apple IIc) are not quite as bad as the ST from the standpoint that they
don't really LOOK like "real" keyboards, whereas the ST's does, and
therefore you are even more disappointed with how bad it is.
Actually, it
wasn't that bad. The feel was horrible, but it was quite
reliable. I used mine as a freelance translator to translate several
fairly large books, as well as keeping my accounts on it and letting the
kids play games on it. I never had any problems with the keyboard.
/Jonas