20 May
2009
20 May
'09
3:21 a.m.
Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On May 19, 2009, at 3:21 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Yeah. HP was
actually the other company that actually seemed to
read the standard. I don't know of anyone else than DEC and HP that
even tried to actually follow the specs.
One could only wish companies had. Everything would have been soo
much easier in that case. Now almost everyone is confused when it
comes to serial communication, and it's not because it actually is
difficult, but people have just become so confused because they
think it works one way just because the equipment they have do it
that way, and when coming to any other equipment, nothing works the
same way they are used to.
Well, you've got to admit that things would've been a whole lot
easier if it weren't for the whole DTE/DCE fiasco.
While I must admit that I don't understand the point of having a
separate DTE and DCE, if companies had just followed the specs, it
wouldn't have been a problem anyway.
All DTEs male, and all DCEs female. Female to female cable, always
crossed (same with male to male, not that I'd expect many to hook a DCS
to a DCS, but anyway), and male to female cables always straight. How
easy it would have been.
And modem signaling are just signalling between a DTE and DCE, for
various situations.
But they could have defined just everything as DTEs, and made modems and
similar stuff really invisible, like cable extensions instead. Maybe
that would have made it easier for companies to get it right.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
In general, when talking about DEC equipment, the
answer to that
question is *always* no, for the simple fact that DEC didn't do
hardware flow control. Hardware flow control is actually against
the RS-232 spec, and DEC didn't abuse standards (unlike most
other companies).
This reminds me of a comment I made about the HP82164 (HPIL to
RS232 interface). That thing follows the RS232 standard to the
letter (for example, it correctly handles the cotnrol lines in
half duplex mode). It's just a pity that nobody else does :-).
Getting it to work with some RS232 devices is 'interesting'..