Ask a curator at the Smithsonian or the British
Science Museum if you
can take one of their artifacts home to play with, and see how far you
get. What you will find out is there is a big difference between a
computer club with a public
collection, and institutions following AAM guidelines.
I agree.
Last time I checked, there are around 15 "real" computer museums in
America -- basically it's the CHM, and everyone else. I can't speak for
the others, but we in MARCH are, as Al said, a club with a public
collection. The only time we wear gloves is when cleaning artifacts
covered in you-don't-want-to-know-what (our PDP-8 came from a barn, so....)
Luckily, there is room for both kinds of museum. Our hobby is
incredibly fortunate to have a professional organization like the CHM.
I visit there every couple of years (usually when VCF West happens) and
it's a highlight of my year. Where else can you see parts of machines
from Babbage or the Moore School, and then play
SpaceWar on a restored
PDP-1? (Answer: No place else.)
But if you're just a family man who wants to show your kid BASIC a
Commodore 64, then club-run museums are the way to go. Conversely, at
CHM's Visible Storage, you can't * use * anything.
I always tell our visitors that if they're seeking a professional,
Smithsonian-like museum experience, then it's totally worthwhile to go
visit CHM in California. Personally I love it out there. If they ask
about documentation then I even tell them about Al and Bitsavers.
Presumably, if Al, Dag Spicer, and the others at CHM encounter visitors
who want to do more hands-on, then I assume they inform the visitors
about options such as Digibarn, VCF, etc.
So it works both ways. Different scales/scopes of museums cater to
different audiences.
What works for us in MARCH is, as hackers say, "the hands-on imperative."
Of course that changes somewhat with our larger / rarer / older artifacts.