William Donzelli wrote:
A old issue of Datamation (Nov 1977, I think - its out
in the van
right now) had a very short blurb about some upcoming S/360s I have
never heard about - models 58 and 7. The 7 intrigues me, being
described as a machine smaller than the model 20, which would make it
fit somewhere in the minicomputer realm.
The only mentions of the model 58 are in the
November 67 and March 68 issues. I don't think
either machine ever happened.
Nov 67
IBM now has three new members of the 360 family
backstage--with one about to be pushed into the
footlights.
Biggest--by far--and most talked about is now
known as the Model 85. It's said to have up to 6
million bytes of main storage and use some of the Mod
91 logic. Performance should be 5 to 10 times that of
the 65 at about l~ times the price. Probable
announcement time is early January, with deliveries
scheduled to begin about 15 months later.
, Next smaller may be called the Model 58. It
could be about twice the speed of the 50 but sell
down' with the present Mod 40. It's apparently aimed
directly at the SDS Sigma 7 market.
Last, and least, is the relatively tiny Mod 7-reportedly
as fast as the 20 but much cheaper.
Mar 68
IBM-watchers note the coming of generation 3.5 in
the 360 line with the announcement of the 25 and 85.
One user notes these two models are more alike than
the 75 and 85. Both make more significant use of
hierarchies of memory--and hence have a greater
speed potential--than the rest of the line. And
the writeable control store unique to these machines
provides more emulation flexibility than the "hard~
wire" read-only memory on the rest. The next edition
using more of these same features should be model 58.
Meanwhile, some us~rs of behemoth systems for
massive problem-solving are unhappy with the price
of the 85; it's the standard squared increase (roughly
four times the speed of the 65 for twice the price).
One 6600 user says he would have rieeded at least
10 times the speed for the money to induce switch.
"We really need 500 times the speed, but could never
afford to pay 22 times the monthly rental."
Some observers feel the lack of detailed specs
for the 85, plus long lead-time (3rd quarter '69)
indicates a replay of the IBM anti-6600 strategy,
with the target this time the 1108~ perhaps.