17 Aug
2004
17 Aug
'04
2:49 a.m.
Am 16 Aug 2004 19:48 meinte Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner:
> for those users who stayed with
> Netscape 4.78 and used to new code for those users who
> shifted to Netscape 7.0 and later?
As mentioned elsewhere, this gets expensive. I know
that I myself decided
not to support Netscape 4x anymore. Granted, I went out of my way to keep
Netscape 4x from crashing when visiting my site [5] but a Netscape 4x user
is going to have an experience right out of 1993 viewing my site [6]. If
Netscape 4 just had better support for CSS (or just plain wouldn't crash in
the presense of CSS) ...
Well, or just skip the stupid CSS (and it'S precessor, the
dreaded FONT tag). Why can't we just do HTML pages the way
they are ment to be? And more of all:
WHY DOES SOMEBODY HAS TO SLAP A TINY TINY UNREADABLE FONT
IN MY FACE?
Gruss
H.
P.S.: I know that you know that we have different opinions here :)
--
VCF Europa 6.0 am 30.April und 01.Mai 2005 in Muenchen
http://www.vcfe.org/