Allison <ajp166 at bellatlantic.net> wrote:
In the end ECL was a way to speed but always at such a
high system cost
and complexity it was often behind the curve for integration and delivery.
It depends on what you're doing.
ECL was perfect for custom-built lab and military hardware. Follow
a few simple rules and even a bozo like me could reliably lay out the
PCB's. Contrast that with 74F technology where you couldn't even figure
out if ground at the center of the board was the same as the ground at
the edge of the board :-).
Above the onesies-twosies level things weren't so clear. There's a big
leap between a back-projector or array-processor made at the onesies-twosies
level and the world where VLSI becomes economical. Gate arrays helped
span this gap but that gap had been pinched to nonexistence by the mid-80's.
Minicomputer makers like DEC who also had their own fabs were in an odd boat...
the process-leading CPU chips couldn't utilize the fabs built to
deal with them because DEC didn't sell enough CPU's. In the end
a vast army of interface and peripheral chips seemed to keep things
churning well enough that they kept their fabs for many many years past
where I was convinced they couldn't be economically viable.
Tim.