On 5/4/2006 at 6:39 PM Richard wrote:
If it weren't for the 4010, I'd probably be
something like a chemist or
chemical engineer now, I don't know if I would have stayed with software.
My early exposure to terminals was of the printing variety. The console
typewriter on the 1620 (NOT a Selectric, BTW), then some ASR-33s. Most of
the systems I used offered some sort of interactive capability only as an
afterthought. Text editing on an ASR-33 was ridiculous--give me a keypunch
any day! The first non-printing terminals that I used were the CDC
Intercom terminals, but Intercom was intended as an RJE system--a terminal,
a card reader and a printer. (BTW, the small drum printers on those things
were pretty neat--I wonder if any have survived).
I built a TV Typewriter for my MITS box, but I yearned for an ASR-33 to
handle printing and punched tape storage.
It wasn't until about 1977 or so, when I acquired a Beehive terminal and a
Diablo daisywheel to add to my MITS box. I wrote my own full-screen editor
and edited my files locally before uploading them. Similarly, I'd use the
MITS to spool my output to the Diablo (not a 620, but rather the 12-bit
parallel interface printer--I don't recall the model).
Along the way, I took on some contracts writing terminal firmware, but
compared to what a processor could do with some disk storage, a terminal
seemed so lame. Mostly, terminals were cheap--a Wyse 50 was lots cheaper
than even the cheapest IBM PC.
Did anyone mention Tab as a terminal maker? They were, you know--they had
a very sturdy version of the VT-220 that I recall--if I dig a bit, I may
even have some firmware in source form for one of those things. I was less
impressed with later Beehive terminals--they all seemed to have some bugs
with the firmware.
But even when I was using a VAX with direct-wired terminals, I much
preferred a PC with a Hercules Graphics Plus card to any terminal--I could
do so much more--and the fonts were pretty presentable. Hercules graphics
weren't bad either.
Cheers,
Chuck