On Friday 08 August 2008 13:03, Jim Brain wrote:
I don't mean to repost, but I had not seen this
posted as yet:
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&…
icleId=9111341&source=NLT_AM&nlid=1
An interesting read. One thing that jumped out at me when I got to the second
page of the article was how wide that screen was compared to its height. Do
you know offhand what the screen was, in terms of characters?
The other thing that I took some notice of was mention of an 18-pin chip
package as "recently developed" at one point in the story, and later on the
mention of the 40-pin package as being then available. When I first started
to take notice of chips at all, most of them were 14 or 16 pins, and those
were mostly op amps. This was around 1970, I think. And it was only later
on that I started seeing different sizes, but I never really knew all that
much about which sizes came out when, or how limiting some of the earlier
package restrictions were. What was up with that, anyway? Why were the
earlier chips so limited in terms of packaging?
--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, ?a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
M Dakin