21 Jan
1999
21 Jan
'99
4:01 p.m.
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, John Ruschmeyer wrote:
But then I'd want to add the Compaq portable and the Kaypro 2000 and soon
we'd be right back to where we are. ^^^^^^^^^^^ /\
Speaking of which, who can give me the pinout and voltages for the
external power supply for the 2000?
- don
donm(a)cts.com
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Don Maslin - Keeper of the Dina-SIG CP/M System Disk Archives
Chairman, Dina-SIG of the San Diego Computer Society
Clinging tenaciously to the trailing edge of technology.
Sysop - Elephant's Graveyard (CP/M) Z-Node 9 - 619-454-8412
*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
see old system support at http://www.psyber.com/~tcj
visit the "Unofficial" CP/M Web site at http://devili.iki.fi/cpm
with Mirror at http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/~cfs/cpm
Actually, that's not true. If that's what we
are discussing here in 2007,
I'll be looking for a list with a charter to discuss computers at least
20 years old. As it is, I already would like to see the charter amended to
exclude all IBM-compatible x86 systems, but there are some people that
Personally, I'd include the IBM PC (5150) and maybe the XT (5160),
portable (5155) and AT (5170). Like it or not, they had a significant
impact on computing. But I don't think I'll ever think of a generic
PC-clone, no matter how old, as a 'classic'.
> actually LIKE the damned things, so it's apparently not going to happen.
Eric
-tony