29 Oct
2001
29 Oct
'01
2:15 a.m.
Jeff Hellige skrev:
>128 and 128D to be exact. I love the 128D, too bad
Commodore waited so long
>to finally get it right.
I tend to use 'C-128' to refer to either of
them, though the
128D is different in some respects. I don't believe there's much, if
anything, that requires one over the other. I also like the 128D but
have often wondered why they used such a hefty connector for the
keyboard.
Because they didn't have the sense to serialise the keyboard data, I suppose.
OTOH, they keyboard is very light for its age.
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.