I was thinking recently, and I know that the general threshold for
discussion on this list is ten years, but is that enough?
As it stands, given the rule of a minimum of ten years, most early
Pentium III PeeCees are listworthy for discussion.
I have a similar problem looking on E-bay. Eay (at least the UK one) has
a category of #vintage computing'. I really have diffuclty classing 72
pin SIMMs and Pentium motherboards as 'vintage'...
I would really hate it if this list became a mostly old PC (or Mac) list.
IMHO there are better places to discuss such machines (no, I don't know
hwere said places are).
Another random thought... Some years ago I was a memer of a computer clu
which has a 'hardware and old systems SIG'. THose two interests were
grouped togther not just because there was one member who hacked hardware
and also ran old systems (I wonder who that was ;-)), but also because it
was successfully argued that if you wanted to run an old system you
pretty much has to know enough about hardware to fix it yourself, and
conversely an old system (even then) was something that you _could_ fix
properly (you know, with a soldering iron and 'scope...)
Perhaps the criterion for classicness should be that the machine is
treated at a much lower level than 'The DVD-ROM goes in here and then you
click here' sort of thing.
I have a Dell OptiPlex GX110 that could be discussed
here; the machine
is twelve years old, and if I am not mistaken, twelve is greater than
ten. (For those of you that live in alternate realities in which twelve
is *not* greater than ten, please disregard this whole email.) I also
12 (octal) = 10 (decimal) (Sorry couldn't resist, I spand far too much
time working in octal, and no I am not missing 2 fingers)
-tony