27 Sep
2019
27 Sep
'19
11:23 a.m.
On 9/27/19 2:07 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
On 9/27/19 9:22 AM, Brent Hilpert via cctalk wrote:
This topic has gotten far more words and attention than the poorly
written mental spew that pretends to be intellectual. If I were
grading their work it would be a D- and a fail is less significant.
The scam is eating your time which is worth something with nothing in
reward. Lets call it 5 minutes you will never get back.
Allison
On 2019-Sep-27, at 6:47 AM, Paul Koning via
cctalk wrote:
My reaction also--bunch of word salad devoid of meaningful information
that reads like someone's attempt at a dissertation.
--Chuck
I make it a habit to assume that every email
which contains just a
link but no explanation is a scam with a forged sender address.
Ed, if this is actually from you and actually real, and you want
people to look at it, you need to say what the link is.
> On Sep 27, 2019, at 3:10 AM, ED SHARPE via cctalk
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> http://rcade.camden.rutgers.edu/2020symposium.html
"... explored these processes of repair and has focused on their
non-linear temporalities."
"Repair does not necessarily focus solely on ?the reproduction of
social and material order,? but also opens up space for the
?creative, inventive and innovative work that happens in the process
of fixing, across human and non-human bodies."
"... offering us a way to historicize and contextualize the work of
repair and maintenance. That means avoiding the romanticization of
repair while also recognizing ?traditions of women's work, domestic
and reproductive labor, and all acts of preservation, formal and
informal.?"
Don't waste your time, unless you're going for some entertainment in
watching ridiculous people.