17 Apr
2013
17 Apr
'13
10:10 a.m.
On 4/16/2013 9:40 AM, geneb wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, steve shumaker wrote:
didn't see it in a quick search.
s2
On 4/16/2013 8:10 AM, geneb wrote:
I suspect it's already there. If not, I can certainly correct the
oversight. I do know that the LoC has a copy of retroarchive.org - I
just don't know how fresh it is.
g
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, John Foust wrote:
Would not the Maslin archives be a valuable submission? At 09:42 AM 4/16/2013, geneb wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, John Foust wrote:
>>
>> Except "Well, our metadata is shit." I think he put that in there
>> just
>> to let the professional archivists blow their coffee out their
>> noses.
> The hope is to be blunt about it in order to not only be up front
> about the problem, but to hopefully get volunteers to
> provide/improve the metadata.
And is there a mechanism for that to happen?
I'm pretty sure it's straightforward to submit new metadata -
however, they're underingoing a commercial power upgrade at the
moment and are offline. When they're back up, I'd suggest creating
an account and see what they offer with regards to new submissions.
g.