29 Dec
2016
29 Dec
'16
9:51 p.m.
On 12/29/2016 10:04 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
Ouch! That means it runs one instruction per revolution of
the drum? that would slow it to something like 30 IPS!
From: Cory
Heisterkamp
this is likely as close as I'll ever come to
having a first generation
machine
Dude, as far as I'm concerned, if it uses some sort of circulating memory for
main memory (either delay line or drum), it's pretty much first generation (of
course, it all depends on how one defines generations).
(Unlike the very similar - in size/cost/role - Bendix G-15, it doesn't have
the 'next instruction' field in each instruction, to optimize performance,
though...) Interesting factoid about the Bendix G-15: it was
designed with the help of
one of the ACE people (Harry Huskey), and is basically a re-packaged ACE with
drum instead of delay lines. There's an interesting article by Huskey himself
in "Alan Turing's ACE" (by Jack Copeland) which discusses the G-15.
SEVERAL generations older. Core memory was a HUGE advance.
Rather more complicated than a drum, but got rid of the
horrid latency with a drum. Even if you optimized the
executable code, machines like the G-15 had all sorts of
insane trickery to make data access faster. There were
instructions that would copy a whole long line of data to
the short lines so that these could be accessed every 4 word
times, instead of having to wait a full drum revolution for
the next word. There were all sorts of synchronization
issues between where the instruction word was and where a
data word was. (Not meaning it would cause a failure, but a
small program loop that was passing over a list of data
words in a long line would be slowed to one loop per every
few drum rotations, as the data access instruction would
hang waiting on the data word to come around, then have to
wait for the instruction word to come around, etc.)
Programming the G-15 was massively arcane, with all sorts of
side effects and especially tricks to improve performance,
so your program would run in a day, instead of a couple
WEEKS!!!!
Then, of course, The LINC was a discrete transistor machine,
ran off a plain 120 V outlet, didn't require air
conditioning beyond typical office environment, etc. And,
it had a CRT display that was used for OS interaction,
program editing and viewing data. That was also a big step up.
Jon
From: William Degnan
I am being very careful not to call this
"the first personal computer"
Oh, I think a good case can be made. People often cite the LINC as the first,
but the G-15 and LGP-30 were similar in cost and intent, albeit a generation
(at least) older.