From: "Fred Cisin" <cisin at xenosoft.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 6:39 PM
While the goal is certainly simple (to be able to
generate duplicates
of odd diskettes without requiring human manual intervention), there
does not exist a method of describing a disk format in a practical way,
that does not require SOME manual handling of exceptions.
Although the number of exceptions is theoretically finite,
for ANY proposed specification, one or more of us can come
up with an exception. Therefore, it remains necessary to
retain a "comment" field to be able to specify additional
"weirdities", especially if the spec is to be opened up
enough to deal with "copy protected" disks.
OTOH, it would be gross overkill to store the complete bitstream
without clock separation of every track on disks that could be
defined as "5.25 DSDD 48TPI WD/IBM 5SPT 1024BPS, no known oddities",
just because SOME (a few thousand) disk formats DO have strange
things to deal with.
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at
xenosoft.com
Some disk formats:
http://www.xenosoft.com/fmts.html
Soon PC's won't be supporting floppy drives at all, you must consider the
fact you are communicating information to someone that doesn't know of the
formatting at all.
It is best that within the archive in general an explanation of what is
"standard" i.e. for floppies how a 765 formats for a couple of PC formats,
then for different formats be able to compare against the "standard".
This information should not be included for every media image but within an
archive in general.
Randy
www.s100-manuals.com