13 May
2005
13 May
'05
4:55 p.m.
Antonio Carlini wrote:
[Snip]
I think gcc 3.3 spots this kind of thing (and the
other common variant:
a[++i] = ++i;
Jerome Fine replies:
I assume that the above statement could have two possible
interpretations:
(a) j = ++i; k = ++i; a[j] = k;
(b) j = ++i; k = ++i; a[k] = j;
(i) Are there any other interpretations? If so, what is the equivalent code?
(ii) Does gcc 3.3 produce a warning or an error message?
Sincerely yours,
Jerome Fine
--
If you attempted to send a reply and the original e-mail
address has been discontinued due a high volume of junk
e-mail, then the semi-permanent e-mail address can be
obtained by replacing the four characters preceding the
'at' with the four digits of the current year.