>>>> "Paxton" == Paxton Hoag
<innfoclassics at gmail.com> writes:
Paxton> Lynotype made lead casting typesetting equipment.
It's spelled "Linotype", though.
Paxton> My bet is it is an early commercial system they marketed to
Paxton> semi automate a Lynotype lead line casting machine. Maybe was
Paxton> based on an apple computer and serial control to run the
Paxton> analog typesetter.
Paxton> I think at one time Lynotype tried driving the keys with
Paxton> solenoids run by a computer.
They certainly had linecasting machines driven from paper tape. I
don't know if those used solenoids on a keyboard; it could be, or it
could be solenoids actuating the guts behind the keyboard.
In any case, Linotype had moved into phototypesetting machines by the
time Apple appeared on the scene. So while it's possible in theory, I
very much doubt a desktop computer type device would drive a
linecaster -- far more likely that it would drive a phototypesetter.
In the late 1970s, Linotype made a very well regarded range of
computer-controlled phototypesetters named "Linotron". They were
compact and inexpensive, and produced reasonably good output. (Not as
good as the competition, companies like Autologic -- but they were
quite a lot smaller and less costly.)
paul