Brent,
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Brent Hilpert <hilpert at cs.ubc.ca> wrote:
My own little treatise on the organization and electronics of core memory
for more depth:
http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~hilpert/e/coremem/index.html
I read your linked article - very enjoyable, informative and
clearly-written piece. You really managed to pack a lot of interesting
detail into it, and the diagrams are quite good. The details on actual
physical topologies (and functional electrical layouts, with actual write /
sense amplifier designs), the weaving together of bit-planes into words and
finally modules are something I haven't come across on-line before.
A thought.. if you still have access to the hardware cited in the article,
it would be neat if you could add another column or two to the table fig.11
- one for volume, one for mass.. just for amusement purposes. ;-)
One lingering question though.. why on earth were the big iron
manufacturers still building massive core memories as recently as the late
1970s? As early as the mid-1980s, 64K of (faster!) SRAM could be bought for
around a hundred dollars. Clearly these core modules are orders of
magnitude more costly.. so why were they still being produced? It can't
only be a matter of their non-volatility?