15 Jan
2013
15 Jan
'13
12:20 p.m.
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, John Ball wrote:
by backlash. If you considered these computers so
valueable you should of
been putting a LOT more effort into cramming it into a storage locker or a
spare bedroom.
spare bedroom??!?
Can I move into your house?
Maybe put my HOUSE into one of your spare bedrooms?
Just the stuff that he hauled out from my closing office
would fill three normal "spare bedroom"s.
about whatever you left there. The landlord can switch
the locks and now
claim it as his own and the courts will laugh you out the door.
Just because you decided to play lazy does not mean that we can't bid in
fear of a pretty weak court case. If anything I advocate for more people to
bid on it because we at least know it came from a reputable person.
He is contesting the "conversion", and making notice that he
contends that it is "STOLEN" merchandise. Knowingly accepting
stolen merchandise (if he should prevail) is, indeed, a crime.
Accepting stolen merchandise UNknowingly is not a crime. However,
if a court rules that it was stolen, then it must be returned
to its rightful owner. Any purchaser who UNknowingly accepted
the stolen merchandise is not entitled to compensation for the
return to the rightful owner, and can merely attempt to collect
back from the seller.
OTOH, if it were to get purchased by a shill, he might be able
to regain it.
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at xenosoft.com