Hey, is the IMP software also what was used to make a TIP or a TAC, or
were those different?
On Oct 3, 2009, at 2:31 AM, Adrian Wise wrote:
Hi Philip
Old age must be creeping up on me since I clearly don't recall
correctly! The H316 is 1.6us as you say.
Adrian
Philipp Hachtmann wrote:
> Adrian Wise wrote:
>> The 516 and the 316 are 100% code compatible.
> Just wanted to write that...
>> Just the cycle time differs (0.96us for the 516, 1.3us for the 316
>> IIRC)
> Have you tuned up your H316? My machine is running on 1.6us! In that
> case I would be glad to get your CPU and memory timing configuration
> :-)
> (Otherwise it would be an interesting experiment to see if and how
> much faster a H316 could be made. I'm quite confident that
> Honeywell/3C delivered the machines in a very stable configuration
> with big reserves with respect to reliability)
> Best wishes,
> Philipp :-)