30 Oct
2010
30 Oct
'10
2:27 p.m.
> I'd say you have virtual memory.
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Chuck Guzis wrote:
So, your definition ties virtual memory into . . .
That's not the way I learned it.
That's not virtual memory by any stretch of the definition. . . .
So I think we differ considerably in our definitions.
Thank you, Chuck!
As usual the bulk of the argument was semantics and differing definitions.
Depending on the definitions, even LIM EMS could be considered to be
"memory-mapped" "Virtual" memory.
Even Magnetic Drum memory would meet some definitions.
We all seem to like a good technical argument, but we never seem to be
willing to clarify the terminology until late in the discussion.
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at xenosoft.com