4 Aug
2006
4 Aug
'06
11:31 p.m.
Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 8/5/2006 at 1:57 AM Segin wrote:
Are you sure you're not thinking of Win 3.0 Real mode? 3.1 286p (standard)
mode does have protection and it's pretty easy to generate type 12 and 13
faults (STKFAULT, GPFAULT). OTOH, nothing faults in real mode--because
there's no protection.
How about comparing OS 9 to Windows 2.0 or Topview?
Cheeers,
Chuck
Surely :P
--
The real problem with C++ for kernel modules is: the language just sucks.
-- Linus Torvalds
And WIn
3.1 does have memory protection; it's just not very good.
Not in Standard (286) mode.