Sellam Ismail skrev:
On 9 May 2001, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> Really, asd long as the reproduction is
identical in every sense, why
> would it matter when it was built? I wouldn't really mind replacing my
> 1992 Amiga 4000 with a freshly built replica. As long as it looked and
> behaved like my current A4000, but didn't consist of eight-year-old
> hardware, the new model would be superior. Likewise, why would it
> matter whether your issue of X-men was printed in 1996 instead of
> 1963? Is it the actual reading material or 30-year old paper you're
> looking for? OTOH, packaging is important to me, and so is the
> condition of the equipment I get. I find aesthetic pleasure in the
> design of the computer and its packaging. I do, however, not find
> aesthetic pleasure in the sight of old plastic. New plastic works just
> as well, and so do new circuits.
How would you feel about a reproduction of a
famous painting, like say the
"Mona Lisa"?
Nothing wrong with that. Why should Mona Lisa only be the right of rich
people?
Right you are! Everyone should own the Mona Lisa for 15 minutes of their life
:)
Eric
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
Eccovi una delle sigle francesi dedicate a questo shojo... come, non e' uno
shojo? Andate a spiegarlo ai francesi... questa e' una canzone da shojo,
quindi per me Goldrake e' uno shojo :p
Tacchan om den franska signaturmelodin till Goldorak (Grendizer)