15 Jun
2001
15 Jun
'01
11:53 a.m.
On 12 Jun 2001, Iggy Drougge wrote:
Don Maslin skrev:
I'll take your word for it, as I have never made such a study.
- don
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Brian Hechinger wrote:
> well, hmmmmm. i've tried a handful of
rates/settings and haven't come up
> with much, tried straight through and roll-over, nothing works for me. if
> it's in japanese i have no idea what to expect output to look like on a non
> japanese terminal (if i added japanese support to solaris would tip be able
> to take advantage of that??) i can plug the thing in and show you the
> garbage i get at 9600 8n1 if you'd like.
I would rather expect it to look a lot like the
Chinese spam that we see
from Hong Kong and Taiwan occasionally. There is considerable
similarity in their characters.
I don't agree. The Chinese charsets which I've seen (there are of course
several) do not particularly look like Japanese ones when viewed on an 8-bit
terminal. Chinese tends to stay primarily within the visible upper 128
characters, whereas Japanese mostly renders as a lot of "square" characters.
I can quite easily see the difference between Japanese and Chinese without any
16-bit rendering software. --
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.