17 Nov
2017
17 Nov
'17
6:33 p.m.
On 11/17/2017 6:59 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
On 11/17/2017 05:34 PM, Jim Brain via cctalk wrote:
Say USB-version 101101100 :)
I would say use a 68000 if your still can get them,
but run with a 6800 style clock. The master CPU and
shared memory on the high phase of the clock. The
slave CPU's on the low clock PHASE (clocked by a inverted clock).
This will give you multi-processing with a bit more than
64KB.
Ben.
It does not have to be fast.? I rather thought,
"what is the simplest
multi-cpu shared bus that could be easily understood by folks and allow
them to focus on multi-processing education, not bus understanding"
How about a serial bus? Physically simple and not too awful logically
today. Say, I2C or SPI...
--Chuck