On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Ron Hudson wrote:
What I really want is to write programs for my Apple
IIc+. fast
programs.
I think learning assembly language is the best way to go then. It's not
difficult, and the experience will be much more rewarding than trying to
use Aztech C on the Apple ][.
I want to write a LIFE program (cells, patterns
movement) Basic is too
slow. (I don't think I even have integer basic) I eventually want to
be able to write <stuff>.system files that prodos can run.
Integer BASIC wouldn't give you any advantages here.
I was asking about Aztec C cuz I have a copy. Aztec
seems to have an
assemble step, which means it has an assembler in there.
Maybe.
The problem is that I don't know how to setup the
files so the compliler
actually works. Aztec currently lives on 4 5.25" diskettes, and I only
have a single 5.25" drive. I have two 3.5" drives, I would rather run
Aztec from the 3.5" drives.
Copy all the files from the 5.25" disks to 3.5" disks. I'm not sure if
Aztech will know what's going on though. Your best bet is to find a cheap
hard drive that you can copy everything to.
This guy made an IDE interface for the Apple ][:
http://s.guillard.free.fr/Apple2IDE/Apple2IDE.htm
He has the plans available for free and the parts cost less than $15
(according to him).
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at
www.VintageTech.com || at
http://marketplace.vintage.org ]