9 Jan
2012
9 Jan
'12
3:49 p.m.
As of late, my experiances with newer windows and older NT about rival
stability and uptime of other systems. :) my only failures / unexpected
downtime are hardware failures. It is all in knowing the software and
putting it in the right environment. (Aka following HCLs, proper hardware
and not cheap consumer gear, etc).
On Jan 9, 2012 6:38 PM, "Dave McGuire" <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 01/09/2012 05:36 PM, Gary Sparkes wrote:
Funny, I was thinking solaris clusters among
other things when I thought
about availability. :)
Solaris is my primary server OS here. I use NetBSD for some network
infrastructure roles (NAT, etc).
as well as linux, bsd, etc.... most services I can
think about don't care if one or two boxes
fail. Then again, half of them
are virtualized anyway and the OS dosnt realize the hardware failed... :)
Indeed. I do have quite a bit of redundancy here (and at work(s)), but I
prefer *NO* failures ideally. I come pretty close to that. That's the root
of my impatience with Windows. (not related to my impatience with Windows
fanboys)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
New Kensington, PA