Yeah, this is OT -- *except* in my hope that perhaps some
*vintage* language might fit the bill...
Most modern programming languages rely extensively on
punctuation in their syntax. Many older languages
weren't quite as aggressive -- or *expressive*. Or,
could shed the use of some punctuation for minor
tradeoffs in programming style. E.g., an explicit statement
delimiter can be "made redundant" by using an IMPLICIT
delimiter (like a newline).
If you accept *classic* operators represented by punctuation
(e.g., infix binary operators) as intuitive special cases,
it seems that many of the other operators could be done
away with in procedural languages...
*EXCEPT* parenthesis/brackets/braces (!) (ignoring, for
the time, the lisp dialects that are obsessed with them :> )
So, the question: are (were) there any useful languages
designed that did not rely heavily on punctuation in their
syntax? It almost seems an inconsistency -- older languages
tended to be skimpy in their syntax (e.g., short identifiers,
global scope, etc.) which would suggest that punctuation
exploits would be MORE valuable to them.
--don