Can somebody
please explain to me why it is so difficult to _learn_ these
skills? I will admit I've enver worked on a 1950's computer (the oldest
machine I've worked on dates from 1969 [1]), but I don't see why I'd find
it impossible given a little bit of time to learn the tricks that were
used then.
I can't see why either - if they used valves (vacuum tubes), the
tubes
should still be available NOS or used, same for the valve bases. If the
bases had been smashed, a schematic would be damn useful.
Even then you'd not be totally lost without a schematic if you knew the
type of valve that was supposed to go there (quite likely to be a double
triode, actually). The heater connections should be darn obvious, and you
can easily distinguish grid from anode from cathode with a little
practice. The only problem would be keeping the right anode/grid/cathode
together.
I suspect if the holder was broken into a fairly small number of pieces
you could fit them back together well enough to work out which pin was which.
Anway, can somebody please tell me how running a machine (as opposed to
having it on statick display) is going to cause valve holders to break in
half?
If it's transistor based, I'd just trace the
circuit...
[1] An HP9100B. I had to start out by writing the
repair manual...
The oldest machine I've worked on... Hmm... That's a tough
one... I guess
that would be the Jupiter Cantab "Ace" computer I'm restoring^W rebuiling.
Oh, a relatively new machine (must be, it's got one of those new-fangled
microprocessors [1] in it) :-)
[1] As opposed to an old-fashioned microprocessor, meaning a sequencer
running microcode. Both DEC and HP used the word in this sense in the 1970s.
-tony