On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Ethan Dicks wrote:
The board certainly looks like a PC 5150 clone. I
wonder what they
found that differed from the published schematics.
Well, a few changes, :-)
the ORIGINAL 5150 used 4116's not 4264.
and, the first row was soldered in.
It was 16K - 256K.
LATER 5150's, such as THIS "64KB - 256KB CPU"
used 64K chips, AND could be trivially set/modified
for 2 rows of 256K plus 2 rows of 64K.
If one were to make an Apple][ replica,
should it be a replica of the IIE or IIGS?
If we're going all-out for the "nostalgia of the earliest one",
then shouldn't we be replicating the earliest one?
Or at least, the earliest MODEL?
They're talking about a board from 1982.
The ORIGINAL 5150 was released in August 1981.
They have, instead, made a 1983 5150.
Why are they running a 1983 copy of PC-DOS 2.10?
(They probably got THEIR first 5150 in 1983)
Their BASIC ROMS are real IBM, (C) 1983, and all labeled #5!
BIOS ROM is currently replaced with a 28 pin chip
labelled "DIAG ROM" (Like the Todd Fischer one?)
I'm not concerned with the date codes of the chips,
but the content of the ROMs changed. [slightly]
When they release it, what ROMs are they going to ship?
BASIC and BIOS infringement? Or, will they modify
the circuit for EPROMs and ship a non-infringing
[but SLIGHTLY incompatible] BIOS with NO BASIC??!?
Although IBM published circuit diagrams,
they were certainly NEVER "Open source"!
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at
xenosoft.com