English has inconsistent [spelling] rules, and
freely breaks them.
Indeed. In my more cynical moments I sometimes feel it has more rules
than it does words. Consider `laughter'. Now prepend an `s'. Or
That reminds me of a sentence that I think is quoted in one of Martin
Gardner's books :
'Show the bold Prussian that praised slaughet, slaugher brings rout.
Teach this slaughter-lover his fall nears'
Yo can delete the intial letter of all the words to form a new sentence.
Incidentalyl, for the 'i before e' rule, I always liked :
'E before E except after C. We live in a weird society' :-)
"I
disconnected the speaker on all of the computers in the lab." does
not imply that they share a speaker.
Strictly speaking, the grammatical construct does imply that; in the
case of that particular sentence that implication is overridden by the
semantic unlikelihood of having all the lab's computers sharing a
single speaker.
Should I have said that I disconnected the
"speakerS"? or maybe "the
speaker on EACH computer"?
Either one would fix it, yes.
But 'I disconencted the speakers of al lthe computers in the lab' could
mean multipel speakers for each machine.
-tony