8 Jan
1999
8 Jan
'99
11:36 p.m.
Miles O'Neal said...
OK, well, 2.0 still sucked, and I wouldn't
even *touch* the stuff until either 3.1.5 or
3.2, I forget which.
3.2 probably. 3.2.5 (the earliest I used at IBM was quite nice.
I'm still running some of 'em at Lucent. 4.x is very slick and
shows the SVR4 influcence and less OSF/BSD... but it's a real
workhorse.
-Miles
and don't get me started about the PS/2 AIX...
That wasn't really AIX, though. Didn't it really start with Interactive
Unix at the root.
Bill
---
" ... Overall we've found FreeBSD to excel in performace, stability,
technical support, and of course price. Two years after discovering
FreeBSD, we have yet to find a reason why we switch to anything else"
-David
Filo, Yahoo!