2 Apr
2002
2 Apr
'02
5:40 p.m.
You've misinterpreted my meaning. I was responding
to a poster who
suggested that the intent underlying the development of a
product was relevant to the appropriateness of its use. That I disagree
with this position does not mean, as you have assumed, that
I automatically adopt the other extreme -- that because there is an
inappropriate use for a product, it cannot be used at all. Your
attempt at a false dichotomy is rather transparent.
I would HOPE it was transparent... it was meant as a tongue in cheek
response. I didn't honestly think you believed in the extreme logical end
to the concept.
Sorry, I thought it would be understood as a goof when I asked for your
car. :-)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>