7 Dec
2007
7 Dec
'07
7:02 a.m.
On Dec 7, 2007 8:22 AM, John Foust <jfoust at threedee.com> wrote:
A lot of people seem to mention NDIS2SUP.VXD instead.
Does NDIS2SUP.386 become NDIS2SUP.VXD on installation?
There are some indications that this may not be the droid
you are looking for:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q127970&ID=KB;E…
"These load failures do not necessarily indicate a problem. It is common
for some, if not all, of these load attempts to fail, depending on your
system configuration. The following sections of this article contain
more information about the causes of specific types of load failures."
And http://www.annoyances.org/exec/forum/winme/1100380589 .
Google time: 3 minutes. Do I get a naughty dream?
- John
The .vxd model is Win95 and above as I recall. Sellam was asking about
Windows 3.1/3.11.
I could use a good naughty dream. It's been pretty boring around here
recently.
--
www.blackcube.org - The Texas State Home for Wayward and Orphaned Computers