On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Paul Koning <paulkoning at comcast.net> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2014, at 10:03 AM, Dave G4UGM <dave.g4ugm at gmail.com> wrote:
...
>
> IIRC, BCPL was block-structured a la Algol. It was, of course, the
direct
> ancestor of B, which is the direct ancestor
of C. We all know that the
proper
successor
to C will be named P.
I thought there already was a "P" and a "D" ?
I know there is a ?D?. Not clear if anyone uses it, beyond the
contributions appearing on the GNU tools lists.
paul