Den s?n 5 apr. 2020 kl 22:18 skrev Brent Hilpert via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org>:
On 2020-Apr-05, at 6:05 AM, Rob Jarratt via cctalk
wrote:
I found time to follow Mattis?s suggestion today
and I got some
interesting results.
I powered the UC3842 with about 16V from a bench power supply. I lifted
R32 so
that the transformer would not supply it. I then used an isolating
transformer to power a variac and applied the variac to the AC inlet. I
also used a load board from a MicroVAX 2000 and an old RD53 disk as the
load, so there should be enough load.
I found that I can vary the AC input up to a maximum of about 40VAC
before the SCR
triggers, the 5V output reaches about 400mV. If I raise the
AC input more slowly, it will usually cut out before that, around 30VAC. I
noticed that the inrush thermistors also get quite hot at these low AC
voltages, I don?t know if this is because of the relatively low AC supply
voltage, or if this indicates a problem of some kind.
The voltage coming out of L3 into the T1 ?bounces? somewhat. I guess
this is
because the AC input is only 20V or so, or it may be expected
ripple from the smoothing capacitors? In the description below, the peaks
of the bounces are used. Throughout the variation from 0VAC to 40VAC the
duty cycle of the oscillation of the UC3842 output does not change, I guess
because the output voltage has not reached its target value.
With the AC input at about 25VAC the circuit seems to be stable (apart
from the
bounces mentioned above). At this supply voltage, the voltage at
the source of Q1 reaches 2V. The current sense resistor is 1 Ohm, which
means 2A must be flowing through it at that time.
When the Q1 source is at 2V, the other end of R14 is at about 0.5V,
which is just
below the trigger voltage for the SCR. This makes sense
because R14 and R15 form a voltage divider that looks to be nominally 25%
of the Q1 source. Given the SCR nominally triggers at about 0.8V, this
means that the current sense resistor is set to trigger the SCR at about
2.5A, I think. This would suggest that the duty cycle on Q1 is too high and
causing too much current to be drawn. So presumably the feedback to the
UC3842 is not working correctly.
I tried setting the AC input at 120V and using a one-shot sample. Q1 is
switched
for about 30ms and then there is a spike on the SCR gate to 2V and
it triggers. The gate voltage then remains at 1V. However, there is no
spike across the current sense resistor (R13), so I don?t know if the spike
is because the SCR is being turned for some other reason. There is nothing
unusual on the anode of D19 to cause it to trigger due to avalanche
breakdown. I got the same result when the AC input was 220V. I wonder if
the SCR is behaving slightly differently because I have lifted R32?
Since there might be a feedback problem, I looked at the VFB input to
the UC3842
when doing a one-shot test at 240VAC. I can see VFB steadily
rise over the period when Q1 switched, up to a maximum of 4V. I don?t
really know if this is how it should behave though, but it seems to make
logical sense. During all that time the duty cycle of Q1 does not change.
I am not too sure where to go from here. I hope the above makes sense. I
would
appreciate any further thoughts.
Switching power supplies are, to coin a phrase, voltage/current-ratio
power translators.
They will attempt to adjust the (cycle-averaged) input-current demand in
inverse proportion to the input voltage, to meet the power demand of the
load.
I am not sure what you mean here. A SMMPS mode chop up the input voltage
and feed it through a transformer. Then it can vary the duty cycle to to
regulate the output voltage in case of load variation or input voltage
variation.
When you load a switching supply, and run it with a low input voltage, it
will attempt to increase the input-current demand, either with increased
peak current or increased duty-cycle (ON-time of primary switching
transistor(s)).
Suppose you have a load demand of 100W. At 100V input the input current
needed is 1A.
At 10V input, the input current needed is 10A.
NO, that is not how it works. I think you are confusing things. All SMPS
has a certain turn ratio. There is nothing magic with a SMPS PSU rather
than a normal iron core transformer. It does transform the primary side
voltage into a secondary side voltage based on turn ratio like any standard
iron core transfomer. But at a higher frequency since then we can have a
smaller transformer. For your calculation to hold some kind of magic duty
cycle will be needed.
The advantage of a SMPS mode PSU is that you also can very the duty cycle
and thus be able to regulate the output voltage as it is feed back to the
control circuitry.
Your statement only holds for the interval the SMPS PSU is designed to
operate in. If it is designed for 110 V +/- 20% it will draw 20% current
when at lower limit. And vice versa. But now we are operating it outside
its specification. In that case the SMPSU PSU will not magically generate
the specified output voltage at a much lower outside spec input voltage.
It is clearly shown by the numbers given by Rob that with less input
voltage there will be less output. I.e 0.4V. No magic involved.
However. If we design a PSU for 10V input with another turn ratio then,
when in normal operating mode it will require 10 A as per your example. But
it is not the case here.
If a supply is not explicitly designed for low supply voltages, it can
lead to excessive primary-side currents.
This is why it is a bad idea to 'run up' switching supplies from a variac
or otherwise run them outside their specced input voltage range.
This is not a bad idea. With a variac you can study the behaviour of the
switching transistor much better. I always do it and it works
perfectly well. I measure current and voltage over the transistor and there
is no over current because of overload. Rather since the output voltage
will be very low the power developed over the load will be
significantly less.
What is bad though is when trying to attach a variac to a SMPS mode PSU
directly without feeding the control circuitry from a bench supply. You
will most likely not get it to do anything until the input voltage is
rather high.
Now this is not a forward converter, but a Flyback type. I.e the
transformer has an airgap in it. The energy is stored in the magnetic field
and when the transistor turns off the energy will be delivered to the
secondary side. In a flyback design the current through the transistor will
rise linearly until turn off. Also there is no maximum duty cycle, but you
mustn't saturate the core.
You don't say what the observed duty-cycle
(ON-time) is. What would be
expected is it's running 'wide-open' because it's trying to get enough
energy through the transformer to meet the load demand while gasping for
resources from the input because the input voltage is so low.
So from the scenario you've set up, it's
difficult to discern whether the
behaviour is normal or faulty (the scenario masks the otherwise-observed
faulty behaviour).
All this is also dependant on how large your dummy load is (as a % of the
rated max power output of the supply).
If you want to run at a low input voltage, remove or very lightly load the
output.
From your schematic, there is a small load presented internally from
various voltage dividers around the outputs, although not all the R values
are in the schematic, so can't calc the current.
If you still get the over-current SCR triggering, suspicion could lean
towards a short somewhere - a winding in the main transformer, secondary
rectifiers or caps - anything presenting an excessive energy sink to the
main switcher, including over-sensitivity of the crowbar circuits on the
secondary side. The secondary crowbar circuit monitors the output voltages
relative to a reference. You could scope-monitor the gate of the SCR over
there.
I would agree that a check for shorts in the output stages can be of
interest. Possibly disconnect one output stage at a time and see if that
make a difference.
The spike you mention on the primary-side SCR gate without a corresponding
spike on R13 does seem odd, seeing scope traces pic could be interesting,
perhaps scope the anode, the gate and R13. Possibility of some odd trigger
fault in the SCR.
There is a small amount of filtering on the SCR-gate/over-current voltage
divider (C18/2.2nF) so you would expect to a slightly averaged version of
the voltage at R13 after the voltage divider (at the cap/gate).
Aside: You have R27 & R28 at 20+20 ohms in your schematic. This is an
awfully low R for dropping the hundreds of supply V down to the
16V/low-current of the 3842 supply. For schematic accuracy, you might
double-check the value of those.
10/10 for your tenacity in this repair attempt.