26 Aug
2006
26 Aug
'06
3:42 p.m.
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk wrote:
hmmm, now you have me slightly confused. After sendi
ng the message I did remember the 5.25" disks (as us
ed on BBC's etc.), but I assumed that 5" and 5.25" w
ere different sizes.
doubtful.
what's with 2" and 2.5", wouldn't
they be too
fiddly and/or store too small amount of data
to make them worthwhile?
Many were "720K" (from 640K to 880K) 80 tracks per side, 2 sides
"fiddly"? no more so than car keys, but yes, Bernie Zilbergeld
blasted them as being "too hard not to lose".