29 Nov
2006
29 Nov
'06
6:26 a.m.
Jules Richardson wrote:
I suppose it's one of those situations where you
end up throwing away
information no matter what (after all, any scan is essentially a digital
representation of analogue data), but there's a danger of throwing away
too much data - and for rare docs you might only get the chance to scan
them once. For rare items I'd rather have maximum quality "just in
case", even if it does mean more storage space.
Exactly. Storage is incredibly cheap these days. It's easy to throw
disk space at a problem.
If you had to fit all the scans onto RL02 packs, I'd see your problem...
Gordon