11 Sep
2001
11 Sep
'01
10:35 p.m.
Chris Kennedy wrote:
Even with GPS leading you by the nose you'd still have to have
enough training to get the thing from the land of 29.92 to sea level
without overspeeding the pig, and both of the WTC strikes looked
like competent hand-flying, both on tape and to buddies on the
ground.
I was wondering about the GPS overcoming any lack of Nav skills
(reception in cockpit, etc).
I know nothing about flying planes, other than flight sim, but the thing
that struck me was that both planes were turning a circle into the
towers (one wing higher than other) and I would consider that much
harder than follow the straight line. How hard would hitting the side of
the Pentagon be? (45 degree descent apparently).
--
Terry Collins {:-)}}} Ph(02) 4627 2186 Fax(02) 4628 7861
email: terryc(a)woa.com.au www: http://www.woa.com.au
Wombat Outdoor Adventures <Bicycles, Books, Computers, GIS>
"People without trees are like fish without clean water"