Jim Leonard wrote:
Al Kossow wrote:
Is everything you're 'backing up'
checksummed?
Yes. I regularly ( == when I remember!) backup my email
by throwing it all into a zip archive and then that gets
written (along with other stuff) to CD, along with an > MD5SUM
file.
Good for you!
Yes, but the md5sum will only detect corruption, not correct it. I
use winrar with parity (what it calls "recovery info") set to 5%, and
if I have gigabytes to archive over several mediums, I use quickpar
http://www.quickpar.org.uk/ to generate the parity info.
As I said, most of the CDs and DVDs that have failed have been
entirely unreadable (except usually for the TOC). That suggests
to me that no reasonable recovery mechanism exists (given just
one exemplar of the data in question). I might be wrong (my
sample size of dead media is statistically insignificant as
I have a handful of dead CDs and one dead DVDs out of a
total in the hundreds), but I think I'm better off sticking
with a simple checksum and writing multiple copies of the
media (or, as with my email, having so many copies around
that losing one costs me nothing ... given that I also
keep all that email on disk _and_ regularly copy to an
"online backup" on another disk).
So for stuff that I backup and care about I rely on the
checksums to tell me that my local copy is OK and I rely
on having another copy (or copies) handy in case the
media goes bad.
My only aim is to try to ensure that I can get to the stuff for as
long as I care to get to the stuff. If I wanted to make sure the
stuff was still available for future generations I would have to
do a lot more. For a start I would have to make sure that someone
else has a clue what is backed up and where it might be and why
it might matter. That last one is my major problem :-)
Antonio