19 Oct
1998
19 Oct
'98
6:38 a.m.
Well, that's just what I was asking about. What do you mean by
'user friendliness'? A built-in debugger is not high on my list of
user-friendly features. Also, how is the TOPS base 'stronger' than
UNIX? Does it have more calls, or what?
and
there is
into
> [Why is TOPS-20 so much better than Unix?]
>
> Umm... It runs on a PDP-10?
>
> Seriously, now, I like the idea of being able to DETACH CONTINUE
something,
> log in from elsewhere, re-attach my job, and
continue without
stopping the
job (Unless is
tries to do TTY I/O, then it has to wait).
Well, to be technical, there is a program for Unix to do this called
`screen'. It's actually pretty nice in that it gives you 10 virtual
terminals, allowing you to switch between them (Ctrl-A <number>) and
cut-n-paste as well (defaults to using vi keybindings---use Unix enough you'll get used to it). You can also detach the
session and reconnect
to it
later (and the program will continue to run even if it
does TTY I/O).
> And, Unix doesn't
> have ^T. This gets Status. If you think your program has hung or
something,
> pressing ^T does a line like this:
> 07:49:28 MM IO wait at .TEXT1+17 Used 0:00:21.8 in 2:34:21, Load
0.80
> (I just pressed ^T into MM and retyped what it
printed)
> This means that MM is waiting on I/O at .TEXT1+17 (which is a label
defined
in the
program. If you wrote the program, this is significant.)
You also get the used CPU and connect times, and the system load.
Unix doesn't do this, and I wish it did...
That's more a function of the shell than anything else. I think a Unix shell that will do that (or could be told to do
that). Granted,
if
you're in some other program it won't work.
> Also, if you suddenly decide you want to go poke at your program's
interior,
> you and ^C^C it and say DDT, and (provided you
know how to operate
DDT) it
> will snag the program you just stopped and let you
play with it. Or,
if you
do this
accidentally, you can say CONTINUE and it will go along like
nothing happened.
Now that is a nice feature, and it might be possible to munge that Unix as well. But that's the main problem with
Unix---all these
features
are munged onto a pretty weak base and people have gone
so long without
these features that Unix weenies tend to dismiss them as breaking the
`simplicity' of Unix (brain death is more like it 8-)
I think what most people lament is that 20 years later, Unix still
doesn't
have the user friendliness of TOPS-20 nor are we likely
to see anything
like
it any time soon.
-spc (Yea yea yea it could be done, but doing it right (or even
reliably)
under Unix is a real pain ... )
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com