23 Oct
2001
23 Oct
'01
7:22 a.m.
I don't especially like munged addresses either,
but providing it's obvious
(and obvious how to undo the obfuscation) I think it may be a necessary
evil at times.
Is there an assumption that spam address harvesters would be incapable of
replacing all occurences of 'DOT' with '.' and 'AT' with
'@' ?