On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Rich Alderson
<RichA at livingcomputermuseum.org> wrote:
Yes. Eric Smith was incorrect in his identification
of the processor as a
KI-10.
That was a thinko or typo. I knew it was a KA10, I'm not sure how KI10
got into the message. Thanks for the correction.