6 Nov
2006
6 Nov
'06
4:17 p.m.
--- woodelf <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca> wrote:
Chris M wrote:
You mean like Wat IV or V or, IIRC, FORTRAN IV and
such. Those are the years the specs were written. You
can call a compiler whatever you want, but it helps to
know with which spec it's compliant.
GCC at last check only supported F77 stuph. Funny..
I recently obtained, with docs, IBM Pro FORTRAN 1.0
by Ryan-McFarland (not M$), truely F77 compliant
(unlike M$'s version). But the manual says this is to
the best of IBM's ability to ascertain. But I guess
caveats like that apply w/o anything being said.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored Link
$200,000 mortgage for $660/mo - 30/15 yr fixed, reduce debt, home equity -
Click now for info http://yahoo.ratemarketplace.com
no, but I think there is an OO form of FORTRAN
known
as F. You gotta love FORTRAN
Well after they dropped Sense Switches FORTRAN* has
never been the
same. In many ways FORTRAN is more machine dependant
than you think
since FORTRAN compliers range from the the PDP-8 to
the PDP-10 and that
is about as different in hardware range as they
come.
*PS Real Fortran has version numbers not years like
77 or 90.