> I was talking about CAD displays with
Stereo-Graphics "Crystal-Eyes"
> using Silicon Graphics machines (at 120Hz). I didn't realize that
> your "high-resolution" remark was referring to "HDTV".
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
I think the consensus on what was meant (in the
thread) by "high
resolution" was a minimum of a megapixel.
20 years ago, there WERE CAD displays (B&W) of megapixel as 120Hz.
Highest resolution that _I_ could afford at the time, on PC, was 1280 x
800, which was well short of a megapixel. (B&W Amdek 1280, with
proprietary video board, but did have drivers for Windows 3.00, Ventura,
Paintbrush, etc. By the time that Windows 3.10 came out (fall 1991),
support was already crumbling)
BTW, I do
remember one crude attempt at 3D that did NOT depend on
binocular fusion!
Wow! How? Using a display capable of rendering actual depth?
I warned you that it was CRUDE, . . .
You looked into a dark cabinet, in which there was a moving mirror,
reflecting a CRT. The image would change according to the position of the
mirror. When it was moving fast enough, persistence of vision would give
you a visual image in which parts of the image were actually different
distances! I think that the images were chosen for maximum suitability.
I never saw a commercial implementation attempt.
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin at
xenosoft.com