Sellam Ismail skrev:
On 9 May 2001, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> Really, asd long as the reproduction is identical
in every sense, why
> would it matter when it was built? I wouldn't really mind replacing my
> 1992 Amiga 4000 with a freshly built replica. As long as it looked and
> behaved like my current A4000, but didn't consist of eight-year-old
> hardware, the new model would be superior. Likewise, why would it
> matter whether your issue of X-men was printed in 1996 instead of
> 1963? Is it the actual reading material or 30-year old paper you're
> looking for? OTOH, packaging is important to me, and so is the
> condition of the equipment I get. I find aesthetic pleasure in the
> design of the computer and its packaging. I do, however, not find
> aesthetic pleasure in the sight of old plastic. New plastic works just
> as well, and so do new circuits.
How would you feel about a reproduction of a famous
painting, like say the
"Mona Lisa"?
Nothing wrong with that. Why should Mona Lisa only be the right of rich
people?
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
Eccovi una delle sigle francesi dedicate a questo shojo... come, non e' uno
shojo? Andate a spiegarlo ai francesi... questa e' una canzone da shojo,
quindi per me Goldrake e' uno shojo :p
Tacchan om den franska signaturmelodin till Goldorak (Grendizer)