ClassicBSD
would need to be about 'have to have' functionality, not
'nice to have' functionality.
I couldn't have though of a better way
of saying it: 'have to have'
is exactly what I would love to see on an OS which I would use a lot.
The problem, of course, is, whose idea of "have to have" controls? For
example...
> Just as long as we all agree NetHack stays.
...this is clearly a "have to have" for one of us - but definitely not
for another (me). I consider FORTRAN support and S/Key totally
junkable frills - but a C compiler is not optional. I'm sure there are
those that disagree with each of those, and quite possibly some who
disagree with all of them.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B