11 Aug
2004
11 Aug
'04
5:50 a.m.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Paul Koning wrote:
I read that, and I understand the concerns expressed. But a first step is
to actually develop a universally recognized format to archive the data
The point of the question: what assumptions are you
making about the
people who are trying to read your archive N years from now? Are they
assumed to be using computers? If so, what kind?
To look at it differently -- if you handed someone a CDROM, and a
stack of standards describing it (ISO 9660, the Red Book, etc.) but no
computer and no CDROM drive, is that person likely to have enough
information to recover the data on the disk? I expect the answer is
"no, not even close".
Well, that's hard to say really. Whose to know what technology people
will have access to in the future? Whose to say they will be speaking any
language we use today? There are a lot of ifs. All we can do is make a
standard and live by it, and then hope its useful to future generations.
> (See also
www.longnow.org)
Vintage> Is there a specific section you want to refer me to?
It's all worth reading, but
http://www.longnow.org/10klibrary/library.htm seems directly relevant
to the discussion. from various media into. The hard part is coming up
with either a
technology that can last millenia, or a system that is foolproof and
will
make sure the archive data is propagated throughout generations.
I'm focusing right now on the easy part.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]